Helping You Build Wealth With Honest Research
Since 1996. Read On...

MEMBER'S LOGINX

     
Invalid Username / Password
   
     
   
     
 
Invalid Captcha
   
 
 
 
(Please do not use this option on a public machine)
 
     
 
 
 
  Sign Up | Forgot Password?  

India's Third Giant Leap

This Could be One of the Biggest Opportunities for Investors





Important: We hate spam as much as you do. Check out our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.
By submitting your email address, you also sign up for Profit Hunter, a daily newsletter from Equitymaster
covering exciting investing ideas and opportunities in India.


AD
  • Home
  • Views On News
  • Aug 30, 2024 - Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast

Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast

Aug 30, 2024

Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG ElectroplastDixon Technologies logo source: https://www.dixoninfo.com/
PG Electroplast logo source: https://www.pgel.in/

Since it was once an underdeveloped country, India is now a prominent electronic manufacturing hub.

The industry has been experiencing rapid growth driven by government initiatives such as product linked incentive scheme (PLI), growing demand, and availability of skilled workforce at a competitive cost.

The industry is expected to double in the next five years to reach US$ 250 billion (bn), with strong growth from exports.

With strong demand from across the globe, India has the potential to become a global leader in electronics manufacturing, especially in mobile phones, air conditioners, and television.

In this vital industry, two of the primary players are Dixon Technologies and PG Electroplast.

Let's compare them across various parameters to see who is a better player.

Business Overview

#Dixon Technologies

Dixon Technologies is one of India's leading electronics manufacturers.

The company operates as an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and original designing manufacturer (ODM) for several industries, including LED TVs, consumer durables, lighting products, home appliances and security systems.

It has largest capacity in various stock keeping units (SKUs) and the largest product portfolio ranging from 6 kgs to 14 kg appliances.

Apart from manufacturing electronics, it offers repair and refurbishment services for the same.

Dixon Technologies' clients include Samsung, Xiaomi, One Plus, Havells, Bajaj, Acer, Lenovo, and Godrej.

#PG Electroplast

PG Electroplast is a leading Indian electronic manufacturing service provider and specialises in ODM, OEM, and plastic injection moulding.

It manufactures a wide range of products including washing machines, air conditioners, coolers, and electronics.

The company also manufactures moulds for applications in automotive appliances, white goods, and home and kitchen appliances.

It caters to leading Indian and global brands such as Usha, Whirlpool, Carrier, LG Electronics, Jaguar, and SMR.

Particulars Dixon Technologies PG Electroplast
Market Cap (in Rs billion)* 791 132.2
Source: Equitymaster|*27th August 2024

In terms of marketcap, Dixon Technologies is leading with a marketcap of Rs 791 bn, as against a marketcap of Rs 132.2 bn for PG Electroplast.

Dixon Technologies also has extensive manufacturing capacity across various products spread across 22 facilities and three research and development centres (R&D) in India and China.

It is also the largest LED TV manufacturer in India and the largest ODM player in lighting.

PG Electroplast, on the other hand, is the second largest ODM for air conditioners and washing machines.

It has eight manufacturing facilities across India and is planning to set up more in the near future.

Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast

If we compare the two companies in terms of stock market performance, then PG Electroplast is leading with a 183% return in the last year. Dixon Technologies, on the other hand, gave a 168% during the same time.

Both the stocks are multibagger stocks and gave a higher return than the Nifty 50 which gave a 30% return in the last one year.

#Revenue

Dixon earns the majority of its revenue from manufacturing mobile phones, followed by consumer electronics.

In both categories, Dixon Technologies has a well-established manufacturing capacity. It can produce over 30 million (m) smartphones and 50 m feature phones in a year.

In the last five years, the company's revenue grew by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 32.1% on account of diversified revenue streams and strong volume growth in the mobile phones segment.

PG Electroplast, on the other hand, earns the majority of its revenue from manufacturing air conditioners, washing machines, and coolers.

Being the second largest ODM for washing machines and air conditioners, it saw a revenue growth of 33.8% CAGR in the last five years.

This is primarily due to steady growth in revenue from the products business.

Between the two companies, PG Electroplast is clearly leading with a small margin compared to Dixon Technologies.

Going forward, both companies are expecting steady revenue growth on account of strong demand for electronics and consumer durables.

Revenue

Net Sales (in Rs m) Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 5-Year CAGR
Dixon Technologies 44,001 64,482 1,06,971 1,21,920 1,76,910 32.10%
PG Electroplast 6,394 7,032 11,116 21,599 27,460 33.80%
Source: Equitymaster

#Profitability

Profitability can be assessed through earnings before interest tax depreciation and tax (EBITDA) and net profit growth and profit margins.

In the last five years, Dixon Technologies' EBITDA and net profit grew at a healthy rate of 24.6% and 25.5% respectively on account of a ramp up in operations leading to economies of scale.

In contrast, PF Electroplast, saw a whooping 43.9% and 120.3% CAGR growth in EBITDA and PAT due to strong growth in revenue.

The EBITDA and PAT margins of the company also expanded by 3-4% during the same period and averaged at 8.7% and 4% respectively.

In contrast, for Dixon Technologies, the EBITDA and PAT margin averaged at 4% and 2% respectively.

Profitability

EBITDA (in Rs m) Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 5-Year CAGR
Dixon Technologies 2,327 2,935 3,881 5,219 6,980 24.60%
PG Electroplast 424 524 934 1,804 2,620 43.90%
 
PAT (in Rs m) Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 5-Year CAGR
Dixon Technologies 1,205 1,598 1,903 2,551 3,750 25.50%
PG Electroplast 26 116 374 775 1,350 120.30%
 
Gross Profit Margin Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 5.30% 4.60% 3.60% 4.30% 3.90%
PG Electroplast 6.60% 7.50% 8.40% 8.40% 9.50%
 
Net Profit Margin Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 2.70% 2.50% 1.80% 2.10% 2.10%
PG Electroplast 0.40% 1.60% 3.40% 3.60% 4.90%
Source: Equitymaster

#Debt Management

Both Dixon Technologies and PG Electroplast have debt on their balance sheet.

The net debt of Dixon Technologies at the end of March 2024 is Rs 540 m, as against Rs 1,781.5 m of PG Electroplast.

Both companies have funded their expansion in the past, majorly through debt.

Dixon Technologies is planning to invest Rs 6,000 m in capex in the next one year for inorganic and organic expansion.

PG Electroplast, on the other hand, plans to invest Rs 3,800 m in capex.

Both companies are likely to use debt to fund the capex. So, the debt-to-equity ratio is expected to go up in the medium term.

At present, Dixon Technologies' and PG Electroplast's debt-to-equity ratios stand at 0.3x and 0.4x, respectively.

Debt Management

Debt to Equity Ratio (x) Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3
PG Electroplast 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4
Source: Equitymaster

#Financial Efficiency

The two important metrics to measure a company's financial efficiency are return on equity (RoE) and return on capital employed (RoCE). A high ratio is considered better.

The RoE and RoCE of Dixon Technologies averaged 20.9% and 29.6%, respectively, whereas PG Electroplast's ratios averaged 11.7% and 15.8%, respectively.

Clearly, Dixon Technologies is leading in terms of financial efficiency.

Financial Efficiency

ROCE Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 35.80% 30.90% 23.70% 28.90% 28.80%
PG Electroplast 9.80% 12.10% 15.00% 23.60% 18.70%
 
ROE Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 22.40% 21.90% 19.30% 20.10% 24,7%
PG Electroplast 1.50% 6.10% 12.10% 19.80% 18.80%
Source: Equitymaster

#Dividend

A company that pays regular and high dividends is considered stable as it indicates it is generating consistent profits.

To assess the dividend of a company we look at three metrics, namely, dividend per share, dividend yield, and dividend payout ratio.

In the last five years, Dixon Technologies' dividend per share increased by a CAGR of 101.6%, its dividend yield averaged 0.04%, and its dividend payout averaged 5.2%.

PG Electroplast, on the other hand, doesn't pay any dividends to its shareholders.

Both companies aren't dividend paymasters. However, Dixon Technologies is leading in terms of dividend payments.

Dividend

Dividend Per Share (Rs) Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24 5-Year CAGR
Dixon Technologies 0.2 1 2 3 5 101.60%
PG Electroplast 0 0 0 0 0 NM
 
Dividend Yield Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.10% 0.00%
PG Electroplast 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
 
Dividend Payout Ratio Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar-22 Mar-23 Mar-24
Dixon Technologies 0.80% 3.70% 6.20% 7.00% 8.10%
PG Electroplast 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Source: Equitymaster

#Valuation

It is important to understand a company's valuation metrics to know if it overvalued or undervalued when compared to its peers.

The two valuation metrics are price to earnings ratio (PE), and price to book value ratio (PB).

Dixon Technologies' PE and PB are 182.8x and 43.8x, respectively, whereas PG Electroplast's PE and PB is 70.3x, and 12.1x respectively.

If we compare the three-year average, Dixon Technologies' PE and PB are 134.5x and 35x, whereas PG Electroplast's ratios averaged 54.2x and 17.3x.

Clearly, Dixon Technologies' shares are overvalued compared to PG Electroplast's shares.

However, if we compare the ratios with the industry average, then both companies are overvalued.

Valuations Dixon Technologies 3-Year Average PG Electroplast 3-Year Average
PE (x) 182.8 134.5 70.3 54.2
PB (x) 43.8 35 12.1 17.3
Source: Equitymaster

Which is a Better EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies or PG Electroplast?

In terms of revenue growth, profit growth, profit margins, and valuations, PG Electroplast is leading against Dixon Technologies.

However, in terms of debt management, financial efficiency, and dividend payment, Dixon Technologies outpaced PG Electroplast.

Dixon Technologies, one of the largest electronics players, is continuously working to expand its business.

It is planning to invest Rs 6,000 m in capex to set up a new factory for washing machines with a capacity of 2.4 m units.

The company is also planning to invest in acquiring companies for growth. It recently acquired Ismartu India to strengthen its presence in the mobile phone industry.

Dixon Technologies also plans to acquire new customers across various product categories to increase its revenue and profits.

PG Electroplast, on the other hand, plans to invest Rs 3,800 m in capex to manufacture new products. It is also investing in setting a new manufacturing plant in Rajasthan.

Apart from this, it is focussing on R&D, expand its product offerings, and capacity enhancement for existing products.

To improve its profitability and meet its sustainability goals, the company has tied up with a solar power plant to meet over 40% of its peak electricity requirement.

All this shows that both companies are gearing up for their next leg of growth.

With the government supporting electronics manufacturing through the PLI scheme and subsidies, both companies stand to benefit from the growing demand for electronics.

Advertisement ---
Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing

Out Now

3 High Conviction Stocks

Chosen by Rahul Shah, Tanushree Banerjee and Richa Agarwal

Report Available

Grab Your Copy

Details of our SEBI Research Analyst registration are mentioned on our website - www.equitymaster.com

Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only. It is not a stock recommendation and should not be treated as such. Learn more about our recommendation services here.

Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast". Click here!

9 Responses to "Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast"

Sivaraman Vasudevan Mudaliar

Nov 4, 2024

Contract manufacturing companies have invested heavily and ultimately they are at risk in terms of receivables, rejections, default from buyers, very thin margins, unsold inventory, raising costs of raw materials, even inventory risk by logistics failures, Spare parts supply outage etc etc. The low margin of 3 percent is always in risk. Does not deserve 500 PE for DIXON. The values are highly speculative and more than TCS, Maruti etc.

Like 

Arun Gujar

Oct 2, 2024

P G Electroplast is better.

Like 

ARUN GUJAR

Oct 2, 2024

PG Elecctroplst is best to buy at any time.

Like 

Ashok Agarwal

Sep 2, 2024

I think Amber Enterprises should also be considered as it's also in the same field.

Like 

Ram Ramanathan

Sep 2, 2024

Excellent analysis and the scale is the game and the roadmap of Dixon is better as they will enter AI server and also chennaiplkant will help in FY25.

Like 

SHAJI K P

Sep 1, 2024

P.G.electroplast has more room for growth considering its products mix and valuation.

Like 

Ramesh N Bhatt

Sep 1, 2024

Thank you for guiding the investors by critical analysis which will definitely help them select the stock based on the financials.

Like 

A. Pal

Aug 31, 2024

Analytic representation helps a lot to step ahead.

Like (1)

Ramesh

Aug 31, 2024

Best EMS equity stock so far has been discussed. What is the best so far may not be the best in future. Other players like Syr ma may take over. That part has not been discussed

Like (1)
  
Equitymaster requests your view! Post a comment on "Best EMS Stock: Dixon Technologies vs PG Electroplast". Click here!