Once in a century crisis & more...

The WSJ reports that - "the deal does not come without risks. Merrill Lynch, like many of its Wall Street peers, has been struggling with tight credit markets and billions of dollars in assets tied to mortgages that have plunged in value. Merrill has reported four straight quarterly losses, and its stock has been sliding."

Even the financial situation of Bank of America is far from healthy. The bank has seen its profits decline over the past few quarters owing to deteriorating consumer credit situation. Also, the bank has still not fully integrated the troubles mortgage lender Countrywide Financial, which it had acquired early this year. Now the opportunity for making it big in investment banking has not necessarily come in at the best time for the bank.

The Fed's former Chairman's critics have said that he helped inflate the housing bubble by keeping short-term interest rates too low for too long, leading to reckless lending and borrowing in the housing market. However, Greenspan retaliated by indicating that the problem lay not in the loans themselves, but in their repackaging as securities and sale to investors.

Readers would do well to remember that the current financial crisis has its roots in the Fed's aggressive rate cutting stance beginning 2001, at the end of the Internet boom and following the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US. The Fed pumped money into the US economy and slashed its key short term interest rate - the Federal Funds rate - from 3.5% in August 2001 to a mere 1% by mid-2003. The Fed held this rate too low for too long, thus leading to incessant and reckless borrowing by consumers, even by those without a proper credit history.

Even commercial and investment banks created new financial mechanisms to expand housing credit to borrowers with little creditworthiness. The Fed declined to regulate these dubious practices. Virtually anyone could borrow to buy a house, with little or even no down payment, and with interest charges pushed years into the future. And the rest, as they say, is history!

Interestingly, the fund thinks that emerging countries shall displace the G-7 as the world's largest economies over the next two to three decades. It also believes that emerging countries are going to exert a lot of pressure on natural resources and the resulting resource nationalism will strain international diplomatic relations.

Gold is up 2% on financial jitters. Spot prices of the metal are currently hovering around US$ 778.3 an ounce, up US$ 14.8 from Friday's closing levels. This response today looks like safe-haven behaviour of the metal. Oil has declined below US$ 100 a barrel in Asian electronic trading after Hurricane Ike inflicted minimal damage to oil installations on the US coast. After falling to a 2-year low of 46 in early trade, the Indian rupee appreciated to 45.85 per US dollar owing to the latter's weakness and sharp fall in stocks in India.

While the government spending on healthcare leaves a lot to be desired, it is the private sector that has been evolving and is in a better shape to provide the much needed healthcare facilities. Medical tourism is also catching on. This segment is expected to clock in over 46% annual growth in revenues during the period 2007 to 2012 to reach a size of US$ 2.2 bn.

Soaring healthcare costs in the US and some countries in Europe are causing their citizens to turn their attention towards Asian countries including India. This is largely because of the substantial difference in the cost of high-end surgery and critical care and quicker access to medical care in India vis-a-vis these highly developed countries.

To put things into perspective, an open-heart surgery that costs US$ 100,000 in the US, over US$ 40,000 in the UK and US$ 14,250 in Thailand, costs just US$ 4,400 in India. No wonder the private equity players are betting so much on the healthcare sector. Whether these investments will fructify into good returns going forward though remains to be seen.